Science of Adolescent Development Continues to Inform Juvenile Justice System
Over the past decade, state and local jurisdictions have been actively developing strategies to reduce both recidivism and spending in their juvenile justice systems. Many also seek to ensure that every youth who comes in contact with the system is met with procedural fairness at every stage of the justice system. To help accomplish these goals, juvenile justice leaders are examining and applying research and recommendations outlined in Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach, a seminal report released by National Research Council in 2012. This report provides an extensive review of decades of research on juvenile justice programs and practices. It also delineates how the adolescent development field can serve as a framework for developing strategies across the justice system continuum that promotes positive outcomes for youth involved with the juvenile justice system.
Specifically, the report outlines key areas that juvenile justice systems should address in order to promote healthy adolescent development. These areas include the involvement of family, positive peer groups, and activities that build decision-making and critical-thinking skills. It also discusses the aspects of adolescent brain development that influence illegal behavior in youth and the mounting evidence that such behavior desists in most adolescents as they enter young adulthood.
This research has sparked much discussion about youth culpability and to what degree adolescent offenders should be held accountable for particular crimes, given their inherent biological and neurological chemistry.[1] This discussion has in turn contributed to changes in some states where legislation distinguishes juveniles from adult offenders and where policies and practices that hold youth accountable have been modified to be more developmentally appropriate.
On July 23, 2013, the Coordinating Council on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (Coordinating Council) held a quarterly meeting to explore how the report’s recommendations might be widely applied. The Coordinating Council serves as an independent body within the executive branch of the federal government. Its primary functions are to coordinate federal juvenile delinquency prevention programs, federal programs and activities that detain or care for unaccompanied juveniles, and federal programs relating to missing and exploited children.
At the meeting, the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) Administrator Robert L. Listenbee acknowledged the significance of this report. “We at OJJDP believe that this report’s findings and recommendations can transform how policymakers, practitioners, and researchers address the needs of children who are at risk for involvement or who are already involved in the juvenile justice system,” he said.[2]
At the meeting, the Committee on Assessing Juvenile Justice Reform presented on how OJJDP should consider a more developmentally appropriate approach to its grant-making decisions, policies, and program development and technical assistance activities. “If the procedures for holding youth accountable for their offending and the services provided to them are designed and operated in a developmentally informed way, this approach will promote positive legal socialization, reinforce pro-social identify, and reduce reoffending,” said Mr. Listenbee.[3]
To read more about the Coordinating Council, click here. To read about this recent meeting, click here. To read the NRC report, click here.
[1] Richard J. Bonnie, Robert L. Johnson, Betty M. Chemers, and Julie Schuck, eds., Reforming Juvenile Justice: A Developmental Approach (Washington: National Research Council of the National Academies Press, 2012).
[2] Quote was cited in the OJJDP Newsletter for July/August 2013 in an article entitled: “National Research Council Report on Juvenile Justice Reform Highlighted at Coordinating Council Meeting,” available at http://www.ojjdp.gov/newsletter/242652/pfv.html
[3] Quote was cited in the OJJDP Newsletter for July/August 2013 in an article entitled: “National Research Council Report on Juvenile Justice Reform Highlighted at Coordinating Council Meeting,” available at http://www.ojjdp.gov/newsletter/242652/pfv.html.
This May, the state of Washington passed legislation supporting the expansion of alternative response teams (sometimes called community…
Read MoreThe CSG Justice Center Advisory Board establishes the policy and project priorities of the organization. The board features…
Read MoreNew Mexico launched a pilot program in 2024 to divert people with mental health needs and misdemeanor charges…
Read More
Developing a Common Definition for Community Responder Programs
This May, the state of Washington passed legislation supporting the expansion of alternative response teams (sometimes called community responders) as a public safety service.
Read More
Finding Solutions to Complex Criminal Justice Issues: Q&A with New CSG Justice Center Advisory Board Member Justice Briana Zamora
The CSG Justice Center Advisory Board establishes the policy and project priorities of the organization. The board features a cross-section of leaders who shape criminal justice policy in various parts of the country.
Read More
From Courtroom to Care: 5 Key Strategies Behind New Mexico’s Competency Diversion Pilot
New Mexico launched a pilot program in 2024 to divert people with mental health needs and misdemeanor charges out of the justice system and into care.
Read More
The 10-Year Impact—and Future—of Stepping Up: Facing the Behavioral Health Crisis in Jails and Communities with Real Solutions
As the Stepping Up initiative marks its 10th year, America’s justice and behavioral health systems are facing a shared crisis: how to meet the behavioral health needs of people cycling through jails.
Read More
Breaking Down Barriers: Reentry 2030 States Meet to Tackle Employment-Related Collateral Consequences
On June 26, the CSG Justice Center convened state leaders in workforce development, education, and corrections from 7 Reentry 2030 states for the second session of the Reentry 2030 Workforce Development Peer Learning Cohort.
Read More
How Embedded Data Analysts Are Transforming State Corrections Systems
While corrections agencies across the country collect vast amounts of…
Read More