
New 50-State Analysis to Focus on Critical Role of Juvenile Court Judges
Juvenile court judges play a critical role in promoting public safety and improving outcomes for the youth who enter their courtrooms. Not only do judges decide individual youth delinquency cases, including the level and type of supervision and services juveniles receive, they are also uniquely positioned to lead juvenile justice system reform efforts. Many states, however, lack laws or court rules—on youth development, evidence-based models, and more—that ensure juvenile court judges are positioned to make effective, informed decisions that are in youth’s best interest. A new project launched this week by The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) aims to address these challenges.
What’s Next
Over the next year, the CSG Justice Center and NCJFCJ will conduct an unprecedented 50-state analysis of state juvenile court policies and rules. Specifically, staff will examine how judges who handle youth delinquency cases are selected, rotated, and trained, as well as how well their decisions are informed by research and best practices. The analysis will draw on interviews, focus groups, and surveys with judicial officials and administrative staff across the country as well as a comprehensive review of pertinent state statutes and court rules.
Why it Matters
Despite the significant and long-lasting impacts of decisions made by juvenile court judges, most states lack judges who are trained on and dedicated to juvenile cases. As a result, they are often not equipped with the latest research and best practices on youth development to guide decision-making. By adopting a common set of judicial policies and practices, states can position judges to make effective decisions and drive improvement efforts that promote a more effective and equitable juvenile justice system.
The Bottom Line
This first-of-its-kind analysis will inform a national report—to be released in spring 2022—with findings and recommendations to encourage the adoption of core policies and practices that elevate the role of juvenile court judges and effectively support them. Following the report release, the CSG Justice Center and NCJFCJ will work with states to lead an extensive judicial education campaign, in partnership with other national organizations, to disseminate the report recommendations through trainings and webinars. Sign up for the CSG Justice Center’s newsletter to receive updates about this project and our other juvenile justice work.
About the Authors


Many reentry operations reported concerns about keeping their doors open, reporting cash-flow challenges and some layoffs. The situation…
Read MoreApply for two Bureau of Justice Assistance grants: one to address opioid and substance use issues, the other…
Read MoreFrom her time in prison to her years helping others reenter society in Pennsylvania, Marsha Banks has experienced…
Read More
Many reentry operations reported concerns about keeping their doors open, reporting cash-flow…
Read More
Apply for two Bureau of Justice Assistance grants: one to address opioid…
Read More
From her time in prison to her years helping others reenter society…
Read More
Bipartisan support for three key criminal justice programs shows Congressional commitment to…
Read More
Conservative estimates show that rates of COVID-19 cases among people incarcerated in…
Read More
A new checklist helps jails and prisons prepare people for reentry, particularly…
Read More