Donate View States View Topics
States
CLOSE
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
CLOSE
Topics
Corrections
>
Crisis Response
>
Economic Mobility
>
Families
>
Housing
>
Juvenile Justice
>
Law Enforcement
>
Mental Health
>
Reentry
>
Substance Use
>
Victims
>
Juvenile Justice

New 50-State Analysis to Focus on Critical Role of Juvenile Court Judges

By Stephanie Ueberall, Amelia Vorpahl

March 29, 2021

Juvenile court judges play a critical role in promoting public safety and improving outcomes for the youth who enter their courtrooms. Not only do judges decide individual youth delinquency cases, including the level and type of supervision and services juveniles receive, they are also uniquely positioned to lead juvenile justice system reform efforts. Many states, however, lack laws or court rules—on youth development, evidence-based models, and more—that ensure juvenile court judges are positioned to make effective, informed decisions that are in youth’s best interest. A new project launched this week by The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center and the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges (NCJFCJ) aims to address these challenges.

What’s Next

Over the next year, the CSG Justice Center and NCJFCJ will conduct an unprecedented 50-state analysis of state juvenile court policies and rules. Specifically, staff will examine how judges who handle youth delinquency cases are selected, rotated, and trained, as well as how well their decisions are informed by research and best practices. The analysis will draw on interviews, focus groups, and surveys with judicial officials and administrative staff across the country as well as a comprehensive review of pertinent state statutes and court rules.

Why it Matters

Despite the significant and long-lasting impacts of decisions made by juvenile court judges, most states lack judges who are trained on and dedicated to juvenile cases. As a result, they are often not equipped with the latest research and best practices on youth development to guide decision-making. By adopting a common set of judicial policies and practices, states can position judges to make effective decisions and drive improvement efforts that promote a more effective and equitable juvenile justice system.

The Bottom Line

This first-of-its-kind analysis will inform a national report—to be released in spring 2022—with findings and recommendations to encourage the adoption of core policies and practices that elevate the role of juvenile court judges and effectively support them. Following the report release, the CSG Justice Center and NCJFCJ will work with states to lead an extensive judicial education campaign, in partnership with other national organizations, to disseminate the report recommendations through trainings and webinars. Sign up for the CSG Justice Center’s newsletter to receive updates about this project and our other juvenile justice work.

About the Authors

Image for:
Stephanie Ueberall
Deputy Program Director, Corrections and Reentry
Stephanie Ueberall works with states and counties to improve outcomes for youth in the juvenile justice system. Stephanie has also worked to reduce the overuse of jail through initiatives such as Stepping Up and the MacArthur Foundation’s Safety and Justice
...
Challenge. She has extensive experience with youth and families involved in the justice system through direct service, research, technical assistance, and program design. Most recently, Stephanie was the director of violence prevention at the Citizens Crime Commission of New York City, where she worked to enhance community-led youth gun violence prevention. Stephanie holds a BS in psychology from the University of Arizona and an MA in community psychology from the University of New Haven.
Read More
    • Image for:
    Amelia Vorpahl
    Former Employee
    You might also be interested in
    Image for: Apply Now for Resident Analyst Program to Increase Data Analysis Capacity at Departments of Corrections
    Apply Now for Resident Analyst Program to Increase Data Analysis Capacity at Departments of Corrections

    Corrections leaders balance the complex priorities of maintaining public safety, operating secure facilities, providing needed care and services…

    Read More
    Image for: Six States Commit to Improving Statewide Strategies to Address Youth Crime, Violence and Behavioral Health
    Six States Commit to Improving Statewide Strategies to Address Youth Crime, Violence and Behavioral Health

    The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center has launched the Collaborating for Youth and Public Safety Initiative…

    Read More
    Image for: Statement by The Council of State Governments Justice Center on Termination of Public Safety Grants
    Statement by The Council of State Governments Justice Center on Termination of Public Safety Grants

    Washington, DC – Termination of bipartisan Department of Justice grants appropriated by Congress last week drew the attention…

    Read More