Explainer: Using Data to Improve the Effectiveness of Community Responder Programs
More jurisdictions across the country are beginning to develop community responder programs, which position health professionals and trained crisis staff as first responders to behavioral health crises and social disturbances. There has been little guidance, however, on effective ways to measure and improve the performance of these programs. This article discusses three critical parts of this process: (1) Assessing the needs of the community; (2) Measuring program performance; and (3) Evaluating programs to determine their success.
Key Elements of Needs Assessments
Before implementing a community responder program, program developers should conduct an initial needs assessment to ensure it will effectively meet local needs. Although this is one of the first steps, conducting needs assessments should also continue throughout any pilot phases and even after full implementation to help guide future program continuation and expansion.
Police Department and Fire/EMS Data
Program developers must know how their community uses emergency services. Key information includes the number and types of calls to emergency departments, the number of interactions police have with people experiencing crises, local crime statistics, and surveys of police officers and first responders to identify prominent concerns.
Community Outreach and Engagement
It is crucial to actively engage residents when designing a community responder program to ensure it is not viewed as inaccessible and unhelpful. Community engagement can take many forms, including the following:
- Surveys to identify local demographics, health statistics, and social service needs.
- Interviews with local leaders, including people who have lived experiences with mental illness, substance use, or the criminal justice system, to assess how community services operate and determine potential gaps
- Town halls, roundtables, and focus groups for community members to share feedback and concerns.
- Meetings with existing community coalitions to learn about current community response efforts.
Asset Mapping
Community responder programs must be designed with the existing community structures in mind. One way to do this is through asset mapping—conducting a comprehensive assessment of current community services and resources. Identifying and developing relationships with other community providers is also a key step that allows for a more comprehensive care network, guides which services the community responder program offers, and allows responders to provide referrals more effectively.
The Most Common Performance Metrics for Community Responder Programs
Once a community responder program is operational, program staff must routinely collect data during both the pilot phase and after full implementation to evaluate program performance. Although metrics will vary, there are several categories that are routinely measured.
- Call and response data: Determine whether services successfully meet the needs of the community, the ability of community responders to respond to calls they receive, and how frequently individuals are using program services. Metrics commonly collected include the following:
- Number of incoming calls appropriate for community responder team dispatch
- Total number of responses initiated
- Type and number of incidents responded to
- Response time
- Number of unique individuals served
- Number of repeat encounters
- Percentage of calls diverted away from emergency services (EMS, 911)
- Time on scene for community responders
- Outcome statistics: Measure whether the program is meeting its stated goals. By analyzing whether individuals are accepting treatment or are diverted away from emergency services, program staff can determine which elements of the program are working. Key measurements include the following:
- Number of people engaged
- Type and number of services provided
- Number of people who declined services or referrals
- Rate of referral to other services
- Number of referrals completed
- Number of individuals transported to another location
- Number of needs identified and met at the scene
- Number of incidents that require police backup
- Number of individuals who require additional emergency services
- Percentage of encounters resulting in diversion away from hospitals
- Percentage of encounters resulting in diversion from jails
- Post-contact outcomes for clients
- Client demographics
- Cost-benefit information
One way that community responder programs are publicly making performance measurement data available is through data dashboards that provide information on calls for services, outcomes, and other key metrics identified through community engagement processes.
The Importance of Formal Evaluations
To measure program success, it is critical to conduct evaluations at the conclusion of a program’s pilot phase and at routine intervals afterwards. This process frequently involves partnering with third-party organizations, such as local universities or community-based research firms, that can provide unbiased data analyses. Recommendations provided by these third-party evaluators can assist programs in refining their target population and tailoring services to better meet the needs of the community. Evaluations can also be used to demonstrate the success of a program to community members and other stakeholders—an asset for acquiring additional funding.
Evaluators frequently conduct community surveys, interviews, and focus groups to determine whether the public views the program as accessible, whether program services are responding to local needs, and to gather feedback on ways to improve. The most fundamental part of most evaluations includes analyzing existing data gathered by the community responder teams throughout their daily routines and comparing them to program goals. This type of analysis plays a critical role in evaluations at the end of a program’s pilot phase. If the data show the pilot was well received by the community and successfully diverted calls away from emergency response units, the evaluation may provide support for the continuation or expansion of the program.
For more information on community responder programs, visit Expanding First Response, a toolkit that serves as a central hub for states and local communities looking to establish or strengthen community responder programs.
On June 26, the CSG Justice Center convened state leaders in workforce development, education, and corrections from 7…
Read MoreWhile corrections agencies across the country collect vast amounts of data and make significant investments in…
Read More19 states were recently granted permission by CMS to reimburse critical reentry services with Medicaid funding for up…
Read More
Breaking Down Barriers: Reentry 2030 States Meet to Tackle Employment-Related Collateral Consequences
On June 26, the CSG Justice Center convened state leaders in workforce development, education, and corrections from 7 Reentry 2030 states for the second session of the Reentry 2030 Workforce Development Peer Learning Cohort.
Read More
How Embedded Data Analysts Are Transforming State Corrections Systems
While corrections agencies across the country collect vast amounts of…
Read More
A “Once in a Generation Opportunity” to Improve Reentry for Nearly 2 Million People
19 states were recently granted permission by CMS to reimburse critical reentry services with Medicaid funding for up to 5 years.
Read More
First-of-its-Kind Plan for States to Support Children and Families with Incarcerated Parents
Our plan—developed with the National Resource Center on Children & Families of the Incarcerated at Rutgers University-Camden and the Institute for Municipal and Regional Policy at UConn—provides evidence-based, trauma-informed strategies for corrections leaders and policymakers to strengthen parent-child connections and reduce recidivism.
Read More
Breaking the Cycle of Homelessness and Incarceration: Q&A with New CSG Justice Center Advisory Board Member Wayne Niederhauser
The CSG Justice Center Advisory Board establishes the policy and project priorities of the organization. The board features a cross-section of leaders who shape criminal justice policy in various parts of the country.
Read More
Involuntary Treatment for Patients in the Justice System: Q&A with Dr. Marvin Swartz
"AOT is a complex community intervention that can be effective or not depending on how it is implemented. The question about its effectiveness is better phrased as: for whom and under what conditions can AOT be effective?"
Read More