Improving the Courts’ Response to People with Mental Illnesses

From Criminal Justice, a publication of the American Bar Association, this article explores how judges and lawyers can better serve people who have mental illnesses.

Published in the Winter 2020 edition of Criminal Justice, Steve Leifman, the associate administrative judge of the Miami-Dade County Court—Criminal Division, and Hallie Fader-Towe, a program director at The Council of State Governments Justice Center, discuss how judicial and legal leaders can better respond to people in their courtrooms who have mental illnesses.

The article is in response to a growing trend: people who likely wouldn’t otherwise be involved with the courts, are finding themselves there due to untreated or undertreated mental illnesses or substance use disorders.

Judge Leifman and Fader-Towe discuss common misunderstandings about people who have mental illnesses and outline best practices judges, attorneys, and court administrators can use to work more effectively with this population.

You might also be interested in

When Responding Well Means Responding Together

Local law enforcement agencies are increasingly encountering unsheltered homelessness and mental health crises. States can help.

Read More

Funding Spotlight: New Grants Support Justice & Mental Health Partnerships

The U.S. Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs is accepting applications for federal grants that support partnerships…

Read More

JMHCP Grant Helps San Luis Obispo ‘Step Up’ to Improve Lives of People With Mental Illnesses in Jail

San Luis Obispo, California was awarded a Justice and Mental Health Collaboration (JMHCP) grant from the U.S.

Read More