Justice Reinvestment in West Virginia: Analyses & Policy Options to Reduce Spending on Corrections & Reinvest in Strategies to Increase Public Safety
This report summarizes the CSG Justice Center’s findings and provides state leaders with a policy framework to address key issues that emerged from the quantitative and qualitative analyses.
In June 2012, Governor Earl Ray Tomblin, Chief Justice Menis Ketchum, legislative leaders from all four caucuses, and other state policymakers requested technical assistance from the Council of State Governments Justice Center (CSG Justice Center) to employ a data-driven “justice reinvestment” approach to develop a statewide policy framework that would reduce spending on corrections and would reinvest savings in strategies to increase public safety and reduce recidivism. Assistance provided by the CSG Justice Center was made possible through a partnership with and funding support provided by the Pew Center on the States Public Safety Performance Project and the U.S. Department of Justice’s Bureau of Justice Assistance.
To guide the effort, these state leaders established a bipartisan, inter-branch Justice Reinvestment Working Group comprising state lawmakers, corrections and court officials, and other stakeholders in the criminal justice system. The working group met five times between June 2012 and January 2013 to review analyses that the CSG Justice Center conducted and to discuss policy options that would increase public safety and slow the growth in the prison population.
In preparing its analyses, the CSG Justice Center reviewed vast amounts of data, drawing on information systems maintained by West Virginia’s Division of Corrections (WVDOC), Division of Justice and Community Services (WVDJCS), Parole Board, Office of Technology, Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority, State Police, Administrative Office of the Courts (AOC), and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. In total, the CSG Justice Center analyzed over 650,000 individual records across these information systems.
In addition to these quantitative analyses, the CSG Justice Center convened focus groups and meetings with prosecutors, defense attorneys, behavioral health and substance use treatment providers, community leaders, victim advocates and survivors, judges, probation and parole officers, Parole Board members, law enforcement executives, and others. Between June 2012 and January 2013, the CSG Justice Center conducted 84 in-person meetings with nearly 200 individuals.
This report summarizes the CSG Justice Center’s findings and provides state leaders with a policy framework to address key issues that emerged from the quantitative and qualitative analyses. Policy options are organized around three goals:
1) strengthen community supervision;
2) improve accountability; and
3) reduce substance use.
Vermont will reinvest nearly $700,000 in community-based programs to reduce recidivism with a likely focus on programs for…Read More
Justice Reinvestment legislation recently passed in Vermont is the latest example of a state turning pessimistic parole into “presumptive parole.”Read More
Staff from the CSG Justice Center met with the Kansas Criminal Justice Reform Commission last week to present findings and policy recommendations based on recent assessment activities as part of the state’s Justice Reinvestment effort, which launched in September.Read More
Vermont will reinvest nearly $700,000 in community-based programs to reduce recidivism with a likely focus on programs for people who are supervised for domestic violence offenses.Read More
Few receive training in Kansas prisons. Thaddeus Watts is one of the lucky ones.Read More
Sedgwick County District Attorney Marc Bennett is leading efforts to safely improve Kansas’s approach to sentencing, supervision, behavioral health, and reentry as part of the state’s participation in the Justice Reinvestment Initiative.Read More
Through the Justice Reinvestment Initiative, Kansas Rep. Stephen Owens is helping lead work with other criminal justice stakeholders to improve outcomes for people in Kansas’s criminal justice system, disrupt the cycle of recidivism, and find savings to offset recent fiscal losses.Read More