Small business owners and leaders of nonprofit organizations are struggling to make payroll and keep their doors open amid the pandemic. So many of them jumped at the opportunity for financial relief when President Trump signed a $2.2 trillion stimulus bill into law last month.
But upon applying for access to the $350 billion of assistance the legislation provides, some are learning they’ll be excluded. And it’s not just business; it’s personal.
Consideration of an applicant’s criminal record is front and center of the U.S. Small Business Administration’s application forms for COVID-19 relief. On the Paycheck Protection Program’s application, for example, questions five and six serve to disqualify a person who was convicted of a felony within the last five years from receiving a federal loan to help pay their workers—no matter the nature of the crime, the circumstances of the offense, or the sincerity of their rehabilitation.
The program also disqualifies someone who was placed on parole for a felony within the last five years, which means it applies even to people who have served all of their time in prison and a potentially significant period of post-prison community supervision. In fact, if in the last five years a person has merely been accused of a felony and then participated in a pretrial diversion program to resolve the accusation, they could be denied desperately needed financial support.
As leaders of nonprofit organizations that are dedicated to supporting second chances for people who have been in the criminal justice system, we were stung by these questions. We share the belief that the empathy stemming from experience of the justice system leads to some of the best work that is done in our field. Many people who have been in prison or jail choose to found organizations that give back to their communities once they’re out. To refuse them assistance on the basis of past mistakes—particularly when those very mistakes are the fuel that fires their ambition to help others—is to withhold our collective support from some of the people who need and merit it the most.
These application questions don’t just affect nonprofits; they also bar relief to owners of restaurants and barber shops and dry cleaners and other small businesses who may have been involved in the justice system in the past. Like all other business owners, these proprietors are anxious to ensure that their employees continue to be paid even as stay-at-home orders and closures of non-essential businesses bring revenue to a halt. To deny them that opportunity is particularly unfortunate because entrepreneurship can be a pathway to economic mobility for people with criminal records who may struggle to access other types of jobs.
Millions of Americans are burdened by a criminal record. And even in better economic times, their unemployment rate was almost five times that of people without criminal records.
That disparity can be chalked up to a number of factors. For instance, people who have been convicted of a crime may face state-specific restrictions that prevent them from holding certain jobs or accessing required occupational and professional licenses. Others in the justice system may lack access to the education and training that are required to enter higher-skill industries once they’re released, and many are barred from receiving financial assistance to participate in postsecondary programs. And even if they surmount those barriers, employer bias could ultimately prevent a person with a criminal record from being hired.
Opening a small business can thus be a viable alternative. That’s why the Small Business Administration itself has supported training and microloan programs for people who are in prison or who have criminal records. The agency should avoid contradicting those efforts and remove all questions related to criminal records from its stimulus loan applications.
For people with criminal records, rejection—and fear of rejection—are common experiences. They have been told “no” before—by banks, by potential employers, by colleges and universities. Along the way, many of them have cultivated resilience, a wellspring of hope, faith, and determination that propels them forward despite the obstacles in their path.
People who have made mistakes, learned from them, and proceeded to build small businesses or become leaders of nonprofit organizations deserve our admiration. They also deserve our support as they strive to keep their workers employed and their lights on. They deserve the Small Business Administration’s support today and Congress’s support as it considers a fourth stimulus package.
COVID-19 doesn’t discriminate among those it harms, and we shouldn’t discriminate among those we help.
Editor’s Note: This is part of an ongoing series related to COVID-19 and its impact on the criminal and juvenile justice systems. The CSG Justice Center has also issued a joint statement with other organizations calling for the Small Business Administration to adjust its application questions. A version of this oped appeared in the April 27 edition of The Philadelphia Inquirer.
About the Authors
Michigan is one of 17 states that not only offers advanced education opportunities behind bars, but also ensures that the programs offered inside correctional facilities translate to the skills employers need outside of them.Read More
Former inmates need jobs and employers are looking for workers. So where's the disconnect?Read More
Dr. Sadique Isahaku has dedicated much of his career to improving education in correctional facilities in Wisconsin.Read More
Local law enforcement agencies are increasingly encountering unsheltered homelessness and mental health crises. States can help.Read More
The Wyoming state legislature recently passed a bill that will strengthen behavioral health treatment and programming for people in the criminal justice system with evidence-based practices and robust quality assurance measures.Read More
Corrections leaders are facing unprecedented questions about an already challenging issue.Read More