New Analysis Helps States Improve Responses to Youth Who Commit Noncriminal Offenses and Children Who Break the Law
When faced with children and youth who commit status or delinquent offenses, states have a choice to make: will they address those behaviors within the juvenile justice system or through mental health, youth development, education, and other types of systems and related services?
The CSG Justice Center conducted a 50-state scan of how states handle two categories of young people: youth who commit status offenses—behaviors that are not even crimes—and children who typically don’t have the developmental capacity to fully understand the crimes they are committing.
Support or Court: How States Respond to Youth Who Commit Noncriminal Offenses and Children Who Break the Law by the CSG Justice Center, with support from the Prudential and W.T. Grant Foundation, shares overarching takeaways from our scan about these two populations, details whether state responses reflect research and best practices, and proposes a call to action stemming from the findings.
What the Project Involves
In 2023, the CSG Justice Center embarked on a national landscape analysis of how states address youth who commit status offenses—noncriminal behaviors such as truancy, running away, and curfew violations—and younger children who break the law. To conduct the scan, we reviewed state laws and policies; spoke to system leaders in all 50 states; and engaged in conversations with practitioners, researchers, and policy experts across youth-serving systems.
Our nationwide analysis reveals three key findings:
- Most states use some form of police contact, court involvement, and supervision as a response to addressing these youth’s needs.
- State policy and practice treats youth who commit status offenses and younger children who break the law in diverse, confusing, and inconsistent ways.
- Regardless of approach, few states have dedicated structures and funding for these youth (and their families) to obtain needed services.
Support or Court presents the high-level results of this scan in a brief along with two “By the Numbers” documents, which provide more detailed data findings from the policy scan, and a “Checklist of Guiding Principles and State Models” that states can use to strengthen their approaches.
Why It Matters
Research and experience suggest that—as a matter of best practice and to use their resources wisely— states should prioritize the juvenile justice system for youth who commit the most serious offenses and who have the developmental capacity to fully understand the offenses they have committed.
The importance of using the juvenile justice system for this purpose has become more pronounced as youth increasingly struggle with their mental health, school attendance, and community violence and other forms of trauma. Many of these youth may engage in status or low-level delinquent behaviors as an outgrowth of these challenges and exhibit such behaviors at an increasingly younger age. Thus, states must determine what systems, types of interventions, and resource investments can most effectively address these children and youth’s needs while protecting public safety.
By examining their responses to youth who commit noncriminal offenses and children who break the law, policymakers can improve outcomes for these two populations. At the same time, system leaders can engage in a broader rethinking of the purpose of their juvenile justice systems and how best to tackle the underlying causes of increasingly complex and concerning challenges for our nation’s youth
Corrections leaders balance the complex priorities of maintaining public safety, operating secure facilities, providing needed care and services…
Read MoreThe CSG Justice Center is pleased to announce 5 new members of its advisory board. Hailing from states…
Read MoreThe CSG Justice Center Advisory Board establishes the policy and project priorities of the organization. The board features…
Read More
Apply Now for Resident Analyst Program to Increase Data Analysis Capacity at Departments of Corrections
Corrections leaders balance the complex priorities of maintaining public safety, operating secure facilities, providing needed care and services to the incarcerated population, and coordinating with other agencies.
Read More
Five New CSG Justice Center Board Members Look to Strengthen Communities and Improve Public Safety
The CSG Justice Center is pleased to announce 5 new members of its advisory board. Hailing from states across the country and representing multiple professions, they are all eager to join the 17 current members in establishing the policy and project priorities for the organization.
Read More
Removing Barriers to Successful Reentry: Q&A with New CSG Justice Center Advisory Board Member Dr. Ronald F. Day
The CSG Justice Center Advisory Board establishes the policy and project priorities of the organization. The board features a cross-section of leaders who shape criminal justice policy in various parts of the country.
Read More
Transforming Lives with Access to Needed Mental Health Care: Q&A with New CSG Justice Center Advisory Board Member Dr. Courtney Harvey
The CSG Justice Center Advisory Board establishes the policy and project priorities of the organization. The board features a cross-section of leaders who shape criminal justice policy in various parts of the country.
Read More
Six States Commit to Improving Statewide Strategies to Address Youth Crime, Violence and Behavioral Health
The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center has launched the Collaborating for Youth and Public Safety Initiative (CYPSI) in partnership with six states: California, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, and Rhode Island. The initiative will help states develop, fund, and effectively implement a research-based service continuum to improve public safety and behavioral health, education, and other outcomes for youth.
Read More
Statement by The Council of State Governments Justice Center on Termination of Public Safety Grants
Washington, DC – Termination of bipartisan Department of Justice grants appropriated by Congress last week drew the attention of leaders and organizations across the country.
Read More