New Data Analysis Guides States on How to Improve Public Safety, the Juvenile Justice System, and Youth Outcomes
Youth across the country are grappling with myriad challenges that include increases in mental health issues, school absenteeism, community violence, and victimization. At the same time, many policymakers and system leaders are struggling with how best to respond, including whether greater reliance on the juvenile justice system and more sanctions-oriented approaches are warranted.
Navigating Concerns on Youth Crime, Violence, and Behavioral Health: What Does the Data Say? by The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center, with support from the Prudential and W.T. Grant Foundation, aims to help policymakers better understand and address trends related to these issues.
What the Project Involves
The CSG Justice Center analyzed the most recent behavioral health, arrest, and juvenile justice system data available so that policymakers can use this data to achieve two important goals:
- Refocus the juvenile justice system on youth who commit serious and violent offenses, and ensure limited resources are invested in what works to improve public safety and youth outcomes.
- Develop a comprehensive state plan that addresses the systemic reasons for youth’s behaviors and ensures that the most vulnerable adolescents receive the services and supports they need to transition to a safe and healthy adulthood.
Why It Matters
Policymakers and the public are increasingly concerned about youth crime and violence. Overall youth arrests, including for violent offenses, remain historically low. However, youth arrests for homicides and weapons offenses surged post-pandemic, and gun violence is now a leading cause of death among children and youth, especially Black youth.
States need research and data on how to effectively address youth violence while also tackling the root causes of many youth behaviors—mental illness, substance use, family dysfunction, school disconnectedness, and trauma. Policymakers also need guidance on whether the juvenile justice system is the best place to tackle these challenges, and what interventions have proven effective at reducing reoffending and improving other youth outcomes.
By placing trends related to youth behavioral health, arrests, court cases, detention and placement, and racial and ethnic disparities in the juvenile justice system in context—and recognizing the connections between them—policymakers can focus on making data-driven decisions that are in the best interests of youth and public safety.
Our mission hasn’t changed; it’s become more essential. The following 2025 accomplishments are a testament to that enduring…
Read MoreFrom new laws and reentry councils to increased funding and lowered barriers, these wins highlight collaboration, creativity, and…
Read More
How Kentucky’s “Seth’s Law” Reduces Barriers to Care for Competency to Stand Trial and Guardianship
Read More
2025 in Review: Justice Data and Solutions for State and Local Leaders Amid Federal Change
Our mission hasn’t changed; it’s become more essential. The following 2025 accomplishments are a testament to that enduring focus.
Read MoreFrom new laws and reentry councils to increased funding and lowered barriers, these wins highlight collaboration, creativity, and innovation across our Reentry 2030 network.
Read MoreState leaders gathered for the fourth session of the Reentry 2030 Workforce Development Peer Learning Cohort.
Read More
Getting the Right Response When Every Crisis Is Different: 4 States Share Lessons on Building Coordinated Crisis Systems
New Jersey, Utah, Virginia, and Washington discuss their different "Aligning Health and Safety" approaches and some of the challenges they’ve experienced.
Read More
DOJ and DOL Announce $155.5M in Federal Funding Opportunities for Reentry, Community Supervision, Behavioral Health, Youth, and Incarcerated Parents
Application deadlines range from March 19–April 6, 2026.
Read More