Jurisdictions should examine their responses to truancy and identify opportunities to adopt more research-based, developmentally appropriate approaches for helping youth who skip school to avoid the juvenile justice system and stay in class.
Five concrete policy, practice, and funding strategies for policymakers and juvenile justice and education leaders to consider include:
1. Evaluate Current Policies
Reconsider whether legislative and administrative policies that allow youth to be arrested and/or referred to juvenile or other types of courts solely because of school attendance challenges is the most effective approach. Approximately half of states have decriminalized truancy in some manner.
2. Designate Leadership
Designate primary responsibility for addressing truancy to agencies and organizations whose core mission and expertise is focused on education and youth development (schools, youth and family service systems, and community-based organizations) rather than public safety (police, courts, and probation), and allocate the necessary resources accordingly.
3. Focus Interventions
Regardless of the entity responsible, focus truancy interventions on partnerships with youth, families, and communities to assess and address the underlying needs driving youth’s school engagement challenges rather than a punitive approach reliant on mandatory attendance orders and compliance checks that doesn’t address the root cause of an individual’s truancy or foster long-term behavior change. Given the paucity of research on evidence-based truancy interventions, jurisdictions should emphasize this individualized approach as well as invest in interventions such as cognitive behavioral and family therapy that have proven effective more generally at improving outcomes for youth involved or at risk of involvement with the juvenile justice system.
4. Establish Realistic Goals
Establish realistic goals for truant youth’s attendance improvements rather than strict, mandatory daily attendance orders that set youth up for failure given that adolescents are developmentally wired to act impulsively and not consider the long-term consequences of their actions.
5. Use Incentives
Establish a formal system of incentives and developmentally appropriate graduated responses as the primary tools to motivate attendance behavior change rather than sanctions, such as probation, detention, or home confinement, that research shows are costly and ineffective.
Michigan is one of 17 states that not only offers advanced education opportunities behind bars, but also ensures that the programs offered inside correctional facilities translate to the skills employers need outside of them.Read More
Former inmates need jobs and employers are looking for workers. So where's the disconnect?Read More
Dr. Sadique Isahaku has dedicated much of his career to improving education in correctional facilities in Wisconsin.Read More
Local law enforcement agencies are increasingly encountering unsheltered homelessness and mental health crises. States can help.Read More
The Wyoming state legislature recently passed a bill that will strengthen behavioral health treatment and programming for people in the criminal justice system with evidence-based practices and robust quality assurance measures.Read More
Corrections leaders are facing unprecedented questions about an already challenging issue.Read More