Improving School Discipline in School Systems
Suspensions dropped 20 percent nationally between 2011 and 2014, according to the U.S. Department of Education, and in many states the reductions were even more dramatic. Despite this progress, states have struggled to reduce disparities in the use of school discipline for youth of color, and educators and parents have pushed back against school discipline reforms, arguing that efforts to limit suspensions have led to more disruptions in the classroom.
In 2017, the CSG Justice Center released Realizing the Full Vision of School Discipline Reform: A Framework for Statewide Change. Funded by the Open Society Foundations, this report documents how five states have reduced their reliance on harmful school discipline practices and provides recommendations to support policymakers and education leaders to take the critical steps needed to move toward a more comprehensive vision of school discipline reform—one that ensures efforts to limit disciplinary removals also foster supportive learning environments that keep all students engaged in school and improve student outcomes.
Previously, to help states and local school districts reduce the use of exclusionary discipline, the CSG Justice Center launched a national consensus-building project that convened experts in fields such as school safety, behavioral health, education, juvenile justice, social services, law enforcement, and child welfare. Youth, parents, and community partners also played a critical and active role in the project. The resulting School Discipline Consensus Report provides policy and practice recommendations and implementation guidance to minimize the dependence on suspensions and expulsions to manage student behavior, improve students’ academic outcomes, reduce their involvement in the juvenile justice system, and promote safe and productive learning environments.
In 2011, the CSG Justice Center, in partnership with the Public Policy Research Institute at Texas A&M University, released Breaking Schools’ Rules, an unprecedented statewide study of nearly 1 million Texas public secondary school students. Funded by The Atlantic Philanthropies and the Open Society Foundations, the study found that the majority of students were suspended or expelled at least once between seventh to twelfth grade. When students are removed from the classroom as a disciplinary measure, the odds increase dramatically that the student will repeat a grade, drop out, or become involved in the juvenile justice system. These negative consequences disproportionately affect children of color as well as students with special needs.
From her time in prison to her years helping others reenter society in Pennsylvania, Marsha Banks has experienced…Read More
Many reentry operations reported concerns about keeping their doors open, reporting cash-flow challenges and some layoffs. The situation is leaving a growing number of people in the midst of reentry without the critical services they need to succeed.Read More
Apply for two Bureau of Justice Assistance grants: one to address opioid and substance use issues, the other to improve school safety.Read More
From her time in prison to her years helping others reenter society in Pennsylvania, Marsha Banks has experienced the criminal justice system in a lot of different ways.Read More
Bipartisan support for three key criminal justice programs shows Congressional commitment to increasing public safety and reducing recidivism.Read More
Conservative estimates show that rates of COVID-19 cases among people incarcerated in state prisons and prison staff are more than three-and-a-half times higher than that of the general public, according to a new analysis by The Council of State Governments (CSG) Justice Center.Read More
A new checklist helps jails and prisons prepare people for reentry, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic.Read More